RESEARCH PROBLEM
In order to promote quality and purposeful outcomes for students,
educators must provide engaging teaching and learning opportunities across all
key learning areas that integrate the active use of innovative technologies. To
be able to do this, teachers require professional development but
unfortunately, there are not enough highly-skilled support systems in place
within schools to cater for the ever-growing technology and the growth of
teacher capability in digital pedagogy.
DRAFT RESEARCH QUESTION
Is the role of an ICT Mentor effective in increasing teacher capacity in
primary schools?
FROM LITERATURE TO RESEARCH QUESTION AND PRACTICAL IMPORTANCE
Report
According to the Assessing Progress of the DER and Potential Future
Directions Final Report (Deparment of Education, 2013) there are four strands
relating to what is required to effectively use technology in education. These
strands are infrastructure, leadership, teacher capability and learning
resources. DandoloPartners was commissioned to undertake this mid-program
review in order to answer the following fundamental question: Has the DER been
a catalyst for positive change that establishes the foundations for improved
use of ICT in education? Whilst the strand of Infrastructure has mostly been
achieved or has seen significant change; areas such as leadership, teacher
capability and learning resources have measures with indicators that have only
made small gains. Whilst hardware and software have been a successful
implementation, the question arising is to whether the other areas would have
success, longevity and sustainability if an ICT Mentor was to be a part of the
DER process. (http://education.gov.au/technology-schools?resource=)
Journal Articles
Seemann (2003) emphasises the importance of basic principals in holistic
technology in education. He suggests that a holistic approach allows for better
informed technical and design decision in a wider range of settings. If ICT
Mentors have the skills to understand a particular that is technology, and
Seemann (2003) corresponds this with understanding its relation to the whole –
it is conducive to suggest that ICT Mentors may be responsible for rich
teaching and learning activities implemented by teachers. Technology is
identified as a ‘know why’ learning experience rather than a ‘know how’ which
has the ability to be supported by ICT Mentors, in particular with the new NSW
Syllabus for the Australian English Curriculum.
Prestridge (2012) suggests that beliefs and attitudes of educators may
in fact influence classroom practices. Her findings indicated that teacher
beliefs have implications for ICT Professional development. It is interesting
to speculate that if ICT Mentors have the ability to change teacher competency
levels then in turn, it may improve digital pedagogy.
Broadley (2010) has been developing research over many years relating
directly to the DER Report (Deparment of Education, 2013). Her focuses are
namely around the Digital Education Revolution, learning communities and ICT in
rural education. She identifies that some areas are facing significant
challenges gaining access to professional learning/development. The provision
of ICT Mentors may or may not see the challenges of technology in rural areas
altered.
(Hammond, et al., 2009) conducted research on teacher preparedness and
factors around support given in school-based training. While results concluded
that student-teachers are heavily influenced by mentors there is little evidence
in the wider context on how ICT teacher training affects student teacher
practice.
As an ICT Mentor and Teacher/Librarian providing support and
professional development/training to teachers in a rural primary school, the
value and practical importance of this research will be beneficial for
teachers, students and the wider professional body to learn and understand how
an ICT Mentor may or may not be able to promote well developed ICT frameworks
with holistic approaches to best classroom practice through building teacher
capacity.
REFERENCES
Broadley, T. (2010). Digital revolution or digital divide: will rural
teachers get a piece of the professional development pie? Education in Rural
Australia , 63-76.
Department of Education. (2013). DER MID PROGRAM REVIEW Assessing
Progress of the DER and Potential Future Directions Final Report. Australia:
DandoloPartners.
Hammond, M., Croson, S., Fragkouli, E., Ingram, J., Johnston-Wilder, S.,
Johnston-Wilder, P., et al. (2009). Why do some student teachers make very good
use of ICT? An exploratory case study. Technology, Pedagogy and Education ,
59-73.
Prestridge, S. (2012). Computers and Education. The beliefs behind the
teacher that influences their ICT practices , 449-458.
Seemann, K. (2003). Basic Principles in Holistic Technology Education.
Journal of Technology Education, 14(2). 28-39. Retrieved from
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v14n2/seemann.html